|
![](images/s.gif) |
|
![](images/s.gif) |
Flexural strengthening
|
![](images/s.gif)
|
![](images/s.gif) |
Reinforced concrete elements, such as beams, slabs and columns,
may be strengthened in flexure through the use of FRP composites
epoxy-bonded to their tension zones, with the direction of fibres
parallel to that of high tensile stresses (member axis). The calculations
described address both the Ultimate Limit State (ULS) and the Serviceability
Limit State (SLS).
Input:
|
|
![](side_picts/frp_flex_start.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Limit State
The calculations are based on the assumption that one of the following
two desirable failure modes govern the behaviour:
|
|
|
(a)
|
following yielding of the internal tension steel reinforcement
the concrete crushes in the compression zone;
|
|
(b)
|
following yielding of the internal tension steel reinforcement
the FRP reaches a limiting strain, f,lim,
(this is a simplified way to treat debonding of the FRP in
areas where flexure dominates the response, e.g. mid-span
of simply supported beams).
|
|
|
![](side_picts/frp_flex_results.gif) |
|
|
|
The first step in the calculations is to find the initial strain,
0,
that develops in the extreme fibre of the cross section when the
strengthening operations take place. This strain is the result of
a moment M0 (service moment) acting at the critical cross
section during strengthening (e.g. due to the self-weight of the
structure), and may be calculated based on equilibrium of internal
forces and moments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serviceability Limit State
For the SLS (Serviceability Limit State), the analysis of the critical
cross section is performed, according to EC2, for the two possible
load combinations:
- Rare load
- Quasi-permanent load.
For the case of Rare Load the calculations are performed
as in the case of the ULS, with the following modifications:
(a) |
0.85fcd is replaced by
fck; |
(b) |
Mrd is replaced by the
acting moment (under the rare load combination) Mser,r
|
(c) |
fyd (the tension steel
stress) is replaced by fs1; |
(d) |
the stress limitations are fs1
<= 0.8fyk (for steel) and c
<= 0.6fck, where the stress in the concrete is
given by the following stress-strain relationship of concrete
(for c
less than 0.002): |
![](side_picts/formula.gif)
For the case of Quasi-permanent Load the calculations are
performed as in the case of the ULS, with the following modifications:
(a) |
0.85fcd is replaced by fck;
|
(b) |
Mrd is replaced by the acting moment
(under the quasi-permanent load combination) Mser,q-p; |
(c) |
fyd (the tension steel stress) is replaced
by fs1; |
(d) |
c
is replaced by c/(1+ ),
where is
the creep coefficient; |
(e) |
the stress limitations are fs1 <=
0.8fyk (for steel) and c
<= 0.45fck, where the stress in the concrete is
calculated with c replaced
by c/(1+ ). |
Bond check
For user-defined dimensions of the FRP cross section
geometry (n strips of width bf and thickness tf
placed in m layers, n/m should be an integer if m > 1) the
program calculates the maximum force, Nbd,max, that
can be carried by the total number of strips, and the associated
bond length, lbd,max,before debonding of the external
reinforcement initiates at the ends (anchorage zone).
![](side_picts/frp_flex_bondcheck.gif)
At each cross section (say A), equilibrium and strain
compatibility equations yield the tensile force Nfd,A
carried by each strip. If this force does not exceed Nbd,max,
then the bond check is verified, that is failure of the anchorage
is not expected, provided that the appropriate bond length lbd
will be available. The bond length corresponding to Nfd,A
is calculated.
It was mentioned above that Nfd,A is
the tensile force carried by the FRP. This is calculated by multiplying
the cross sectional area Af by the product of elastic
modulus times strain, Ef f,
where f results through
cross section equilibrium and compatibility. The equations in
this case are identical to those used in the ULS, with the provision
that the tensile steel reinforcement may not be yielding. Hence
the same formulas used for the ULS apply, with:
(a)
|
Mrd replaced by the design value of the bending
moment acting at section A, Msd,A
|
(b)
|
fyd replaced by fsd1;
|
(c)
|
o taken approximately
equal to that corresponding to Mo, times the
reduction factor (Msd,A/Msd). This
implies the assumption that the bending moment during strengthening
at cross section A, Mo,A , is equal to Mo
(acting at the critical section) reduced by the factor Msd,A/Msd
(note that Msd is acting at the critical section).
|
|
|
|
|